|
Paul Hopmeier and Ron Robertson-Swann
Last year my portrait of Stephen Mori consisted of
seven panels. I liked the wide scan of it. Various glimpses, distances
and attitudes made up the whole portrait. With Stephen though, there were
too many heads of the same person. I did not want to do a big head. I
decided, therefore, to do a group portrait. With this picture of Paul
and Ron, I wanted the same scan as Stephens offered. Two full arm
reaches still could not encompass the picture. You almost have to physically
enter the picture to see it. I wanted to build the figures into a space
rather than have them occupy the given space of the painting. I wanted
to use the space as an element that was at least as generative as the
marks and colours thet made up the faces and bodies of the subjects. This
might reflect a sculptors thinking as much as anything. Here, I
am a sculptor. My tools are not clay or steel but paint and lots of lateral
space.
The space that the figures occupy, while universally grey, is clearly
divided into various depths and differences. The remains of other figures
in the picture remodel the space. Paul and Ron are not necessarily looking
across the space at each other, or if they are, the space has time folded
through it.
Painting portraits, however is not as dry a process as those descriptions
imply. I have known Paul and Ron so long now, I do not need to look at
them to conjure them, or at least my version of them. As professional
and social acquiantances there has been much experience to draw from.
I have attempted to borrow from these experiences to add to my more formal
aims. If I have captured something of the subject, then those formal aims
have ben well appplied.
Initially I had wanted to include into the picture, more members of the
sculptors supper club (who dine together once a month). Paul and
Ron however were the only survivors in the battle that took place on the
canvas. Some poor members were mercilessly wiped from the board in response
to the demands of the picture. In the game of the painting, I was aiming
for a point where no more moves could be productively made. If I have
succeeded then its check mate. If I fail, its stale.
Why the subject?
I have known Paul and Ron since I was a student at The National Art School
in 1971. We have subsequently been sculpor - colleagues in Sydney since
then, collectively seeking to get to the bottom of sculpture.
Paul and Ron were the remains of a group portrait which at its busiest
contained another four sculptors. These sculptors were subsequently painted
out either because they were too difficult (to paint), or needed to be
sacrificed for the well being of the painting.
Technique
The painting is painted on eight plywood panels with oil paint. The initial
cartoon was drawn in charcoal. As the subjects were painted the panels
were also juggled. This process was repeated until the picture was satisfactorily
resolved. Whoever survived this process survived in the painting. If it
was not a game of chess, there was a battle none the less. Those that
were left standing remained in the picture.
If a story emerges out of this process, then there was some purpose in
painting it. I am not sure what the story is. It is shrouded in the mist
of the background. The panels visually fold over one another. This is
a time space, not a physical one.
Anecdotes
The sculptors have met for a monthly dinner for nearly fifteen years.
We have guests come to talk on a particular subject, or we show slides
of works that interest us and we discuss each others work and (non-professional)
aspirations. The dinners are sometimes dull.They are more often stimulating.
Sometimes they are wild and inspiring. The history that we share is unique
and special. I have drawn from this experience to paint the portrait.
What do they think of the portrait?
I have not dared to show it.
Why do I do portraits?
We do stuff and believe in stuff out of our hunches, our hopes, our feelings.
I believe there is work to be done that hasnt been done. Portraiture
is important because we need to believe in the worth of individuals to
be pictorially represented. While the act of painting portraits is undervalued,
then so are individuals undervalued. We must believe that we can say something
profound or of value or significance about each other. If we cant
then it is all arbitrary. We remain circumstancial, blood, bones and genes.
Portraiture is also available to all viewers regardless of their cultural
status. It is the subject or it is not. It is as measurable as sport.
Was the work commissioned?
No.
© Michael Snape 1973-2008
|
|
|